She noted, however, that such a requirement might be “near impossible” for some potential Biden appointees to meet and added that in those cases, officials should be required to publicly disclose their past clients and recuse themselves from “decisions that would affect previous clients, employers, or corporations in which they have a previous financial interest.”. Gen. David Petraeus, commander of the International Security Assistance Force is in Washington to give his assessment of military progress that would allow the U.S. to begin withdrawing troops from Afghanistan. While she made the wrong call supporting the 2011 intervention in Libya, Flournoy rightly recognizes that it's in America's interest to be active in the world rather than hesitant. “President-elect Joe Biden is expected to select notorious war-hawk Michele Flournoy, who supported the wars in Iraq, Libya and Syria when she worked at the Pentagon and is on the board of military IT contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, as his candidate for Secretary of Defense,” reads one petition put forward by the group. Based …

“The Secretary of Defense should … be willing to make the hard choices necessary to prepare for the future fight—and Congress should support the Pentagon when these hard but correct choices are made,” she said. If she is selected to lead the Pentagon, her most obvious area of emphasis will be fiscal responsibility. Money Minute — When Should You Close a Credit Card? But he remains at odds with the left on some crucial issues, including how to address Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. In a 2018 interview with the Post, Flournoy slammed Trump for abandoning Syria to Bashar Assad’s regime and Iran. I don’t think it’s appropriate to think of those choices in terms of service or programmatic ‘winners or losers.’ Michèle has a calm and practical mind and I’m confident she appreciates the rising importance of the cyber and space domains, the importance of regaining and/or maintaining our technological edge for the future, and the value of initiatives like [joint all-domain command and control] which, as it matures, will give our military capabilities greater than the sum of its parts.”. Prior to that she worked on national security issues at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and as a second principal deputy in the defense department during Clinton’s second term, for which her responsibilities included covering Russia, Ukraine and Eurasia.

Other names that have been floated include outgoing Arizona Republican Sen. Martha McSally, the first female Air Force pilot to fly in combat, and Army combat veteran Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.). The event featured Matt Duss, foreign policy adviser to, Sanders, and was promoted with the tagline: “Want to help pressure Biden on foreign policy?” Few folks would be better equipped to do that than Duss, who, During the call, Duss was asked if Sanders, or other lawmakers, had interest in blocking Flournoy’s potential nomination. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and “Contact your Senators right now and tell them: no weapons industry war-hawks in the President’s cabinet!”. Ramping up advanced technology such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and integrating it into weapon systems and evolving warfighting concepts is likely to be a second focus area for her. Gen. David Petraeus, commander of the International Security Assistance Force is in Washington to give his assessment of military progress that would allow the U.S. to begin withdrawing troops from Afghanistan. During the October call, Flournoy also discussed the military’s use of drones, civilian casualties in overseas conflicts, and the defense budget, which progressives have long campaigned to slim down. We noticed you have an ad blocker on. As Defense Secretary Flournoy Is Likely to Pursue More Aggressive Cyber Defense and Cyber Offensive Command and Control Capabilities. Can you pitch in a few bucks to help fund Mother Jones' investigative journalism? We're a nonprofit (so it's tax-deductible), and reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget. “That’s, I think, something we need to work towards.”. “And we need to do this with two timeframes in mind: deterrence in the interim (the next 5-10 years) and deterrence in the long term (10 years and beyond).”. Laying out plans for a strong defense strategy and continuing or reversing Trump policies as to the U.S. military will be an early and critical test of Biden’s promises and deliveries.